📊Reputation System
How influence is earned, maintained, and decays over time to ensure fair governance.
👥 Why Reputation Matters
In traditional token-based governance models, influence is directly tied to token holdings. This creates an imbalance where large holders (whales) can dominate voting power regardless of their actual contribution or participation in the ecosystem. Server Protocol introduces a reputation system to solve this.
Reputation ensures that influence is earned through consistent and meaningful participation, not simply held through passive staking or capital.
🧮 How It Works
Users can earn Reputation Points (RP) by participating actively through $BYTES, specifically by:
Voting on project proposals
Proposing new projects
Each time a user spends $BYTES, they are rewarded with RP — but with controlled limits and rules to maintain fairness.
📈 Reputation Point Accumulation:
+1 RP for every $BYTES-based action (proposal or vote)
A maximum of 3 Reputation Points per day can be earned
A global cap of 20 Reputation Points per user
This system rewards active users without allowing excessive accumulation in short periods.
⏳ Reputation Decay Mechanism
To encourage continuous engagement, users who stop participating will gradually lose Reputation Points over time.
After 1 week of inactivity (no $BYTES spent), the user begins to lose 1 RP per week
This continues until the user reaches 0 RP, unless reactivated through new votes or proposals
This decay system protects the protocol against dormant wallets or whales passively holding influence over time without participating.
⚖️ Impact of Reputation on Governance
Reputation directly affects voting power. The weight of a user's vote is calculated as:
This creates a model where:
Active users with a high reputation gain more influence in decision-making
Inactive users gradually lose their ability to steer the protocol
Capital alone is not sufficient to dominate governance
🔒 Anti-Manipulation Safeguards
One vote per user per project: Users can’t vote multiple times on the same proposal.
Vote direction change is allowed (positive to negative or vice versa), but not additive.
Reputation is non-transferable, tied to a wallet's history of participation, making it resistant to market speculation or farming.
Last updated